
Generative AI in Discovery: Protective Orders as an Emerging Point of Dispute
As courts have begun addressing generative AI in the privilege and work product context, they are also confronting related disputes in the context of protective orders. Recent decisions Morgan v. V2X, Inc. and Jeffries v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. show that disagreements about how protective orders should address the use of AI in discovery — issues previously handled through negotiation — now will be informed by guidance from the courts.

There’s a New Sheriff in Town — Texas as Privacy Regulator
For many years, the privacy community took the position that the state of California was the leading data privacy regulator. The state of New York, with its active cyber enforcement by the New York Department of Financial Services, was a close second. However, in the past two years, Texas has emerged not only as a significant privacy regulator but also as an aggressive enforcer of its laws.
The New Cyber Doctrine of the United States: The Trump Administration Issues Cyber Strategy and Executive Order Targeting Cybercrime
The New Cyber Doctrine of the United States: The Trump Administration Issues Cyber Strategy and Executive Order Targeting Cybercrime
On March 6, 2026, the Trump Administration released President Trump’s Cyber Strategy for America, and an Executive Order targeting cyber-enabled crime, fraud, and predatory schemes. Together these documents do more than merely outline the Administration’s response to cyber threats; they articulate a new cyber doctrine centered on imposing costs on adversaries and mobilizing both government and private-sector capabilities at scale.

Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes Next
In February 2026, two federal courts drew national attention by addressing generative AI in the privilege context. At first glance, the decisions appear incongruent: one denied privilege where AI was used; the other upheld work product protection in a similar context. Yet neither decision announced a shift in privilege law. Each applied existing principles to new factual settings. The practical implications are straightforward: understand the confidentiality terms governing AI platforms, ensure appropriate attorney involvement where privilege is sought, and maintain disciplined policies around AI-assisted legal analysis.
UK Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Outlook for 2026: What Financial Services Firms Need To Know
Last year saw many developments across the international data privacy and cybersecurity landscape, and this momentum shows no sign of slowing.

Regulatory Update: National Association of Insurance Commissioners Fall 2025 National Meeting
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) held its Fall 2025 National Meeting (Fall Meeting) December 8–11, 2025. This blog summarizes the highlights from this meeting in addition to interim meetings held in lieu of taking place during the Fall Meeting. Highlights include evaluation of insurers’ use of funding-agreement-backed note (FABN) and funding-agreement-backed securities (FABS) programs, adoption of guidance regarding the risk transfer analysis for combination reinsurance contracts, discussion of a new committee structure for NAIC investment monitoring activities, and consideration of additional regulatory frameworks to address insurers’ use of artificial intelligence (AI).
Unpacking the December 11, 2025 Executive Order: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
On December 11, 2025, President Trump issued a new Executive Order (EO) to protect American Artificial Intelligence (AI) innovation from “the most onerous and excessive laws emerging from the States that threaten to stymie innovation.” Consistent with the President’s July 2025 America’s AI Action Plan, the EO further indicates, “[i]t is the policy of the United States to sustain and enhance the United States’ global AI dominance through a minimally burdensome national policy framework for AI.” (more…)
FINRA Issues 2026 Regulatory Oversight Report
On December 9, 2025, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) released its 2026 Annual Regulatory Oversight Report (2026 Report). The nearly 90-page report highlights emerging risks — including cybersecurity, data privacy, and generative AI (GenAI) — and offers tools and best practices for member firms. It also reemphasizes the perennial focus areas of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) compliance, third-party vendor management, best execution, consolidated audit trail (CAT), and compliance with the financial responsibility rules. Below are key takeaways, followed by a deeper dive into notable areas of focus, for some of the topics most relevant for broker-dealers.

EU Digital Omnibus: Implications for MedTech Companies
The European Commission (Commission) released its Digital Omnibus package, which aims to streamline and recalibrate certain aspects of the fast-growing body of EU digital regulations, on November 19, 2025. Rather than rewrite the core legislative instruments, including Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act), Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 (Data Act) and Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2), the Commission has opted for a series of targeted amendments intended to reduce overlap, smooth implementation and increase legal certainty. The Digital Omnibus package is now open for review for an eight-week period, which is being extended until the proposals are available in all EU languages, allowing stakeholders to comment directly on the Commission-adopted texts before negotiations progress in the Parliament and Council.
EU Digital Omnibus: The European Commission Proposes Important Changes to the EU’s Digital Rulebook
On November 19, 2025, the European Commission officially adopted a proposal for the Digital Omnibus package. Specifically, the Digital Omnibus package consists of two legislative proposals, a Digital Omnibus on AI and a general Digital Omnibus (Digital Legislation Omnibus). The proposed package marks the Commission’s first step toward optimising the EU’s digital rulebook. It draws on more than a year of preparatory work and extensive stakeholder feedback: businesses across a number of different sectors have highlighted concerns about regulatory overlap, uneven national implementation and the need for clearer cross-regime rules and streamlined reporting.

